Tuesday, February 10, 2009

Kinetic Energy and Potential Energy

Roller Coaster in Warner Bros – Movie World Australia

If you are the engineer in charge of constructing the roller coaster of the Theme Park, which part of the roller coaster track will you consider to be positioned at the highest point? Is it at the beginning of the ride, in the middle of the ride or actually it doesn’t really matter? The answers to these questions will be found in this section where I will talk about Mechanical Energy and how this concept applies to our daily life.
Different Kinds of Mechanical Energy
There are two types of mechanical energy that a body can possess. One is the Kinetic Energy (K.E.) and the other is the potential energy. For potential energy, we will focus on the Gravitational Potential Energy (G.P.E.).
Kinetic Energy (K.E.)
The K.E. is expressed as equal to mass of the body multiple by squared of the speed (i.e. speed x speed) and divided by half.
Gravitational Potential Energy (G.P.E.)
The G.P.E. is expressed as equal to the product of the object’s weight (mass x gravitational field strength (g)) and its height (h) above a reference level.

The “m” in both K.E. and G.P.E. stands for mass of the object. The “v” stands for speed.
Where to find maximum G.P.E.?
In the case of the roller coaster (refer to the simplified diagram below):


At which point (A, B or C) will you consider that the roller coaster possesses the maximum amount of G.P.E.? Take a few minutes to think about it…

As I have mentioned earlier on that G.P.E. needs to consider height, the height we are considering in this case is the vertical height as shown in the diagram. Point A should have the maximum G.P.E. as compared to point C. As you can see from the diagram, we need a reference line for us to determine the height in the G.P.E. Without any reference line, there is practically no point in referring to the G.P.E.

What if we change the reference line to other position as shown in the diagram below?


By having this new reference line or point of reference, the G.P.E. at point A will be lesser as compared to the previous reference line. Why is that so? We know that mass of the roller coaster is the same and gravitational field strength is the same, so what has changed here? Take a while to think...

You are right if you think that the vertical height has changed which causes the G.P.E. to be different in the above two cases.

Next, we look at how G.P.E. can change into K.E..


Looking at the above diagram, at point A, we know that the roller coaster possesses the greatest amount of G.P.E. What happens to the energy in the roller coaster at point B? Assuming negligible frictional force and air resistance acting on the roller coaster here, all the G.P.E at point A is converted into K.E. at point B, hence, the roller coaster possesses the maximum amount of K.E. In this ideal case, all the G.P.E. is converted to K.E. based on the Principle of Conservation of Energy. As you can probably find the statement in any typical physics textbook which states that:

Energy can neither be created nor destroyed in any process. It can be converted from one form to another or transferred from one body to another, but the total amount remains constant.

However, in reality, not all G.P.E is converted to K.E. If the above statement on Principle of Conservation of Energy is correct, why not all G.P.E is converted to K.E. in the case of the roller coaster? This is because some of the G.P.E. is converted to heat energy, sound energy and to overcome frictional force. The use of K.E. and G.P.E. concepts can also be applied to the water slides as shown below.

Water Slides in Singapore

The web-link will show you a video on how Kinetic and Potential Energy concepts are used from construction of the water slides like the one Jurong East Swimming Complex to the roller coaster in WB Movie World.
http://videos.howstuffworks.com/hsw/6175-work-and-energy-energy-video.htm







24 comments:

  1. 31.
    oh.
    so the distance to the ground defines its gravitational potential energy?
    then what about the distance from the object to the core of the earth? is that counted?

    ReplyDelete
  2. So G.P.E=MGH and KE=1/2MV^2 haha i understand the article

    ReplyDelete
  3. 6. i learnt more about kinetic energy and gravitational potential energy after reading. i dont really understand so much on energy when i learnt the basics in primary school, but now i know better.

    ReplyDelete
  4. 9. I don't mean to sound rude or anything... ya, but this seems to be an extension of the topics learnt in primary 6 and sec 1. But ya, it's useful.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Wow so scientific.... I don't really understand the K.E definition. But yeap the rest is quite easy(:
    -17

    ReplyDelete
  6. 23. This is another reason why we should learn physics... can be applied to many things IRL. Quite easy to understand, thanks for the info.

    ReplyDelete
  7. 19 says we learnt this last year but not so in-depth.Now i understand clearer about energy.I hope this topic is not as boring as Kinematics.

    ReplyDelete
  8. 4. I find that it helps me to understand K.E and G.P.E better and have a deeper understanding of the topic as some information found here are not taught in the p6 and sec1 topic on energy.

    ReplyDelete
  9. ohh! so G.P.E will change according to the reference line(:

    ReplyDelete
  10. (13)-->>I learnt more about Gravitational potential energy.now,i have a deeper understanding on what i learnt from the past few years and the G.P.E goes according to the reference line.

    ReplyDelete
  11. 5. Oh so GPE is height x mass , i didnt know that i think. or i forgot, i think i understand about KE and GPE better now after reading this. i hope this topic will be interesting. :]

    ReplyDelete
  12. 7.I learn more about G.P.E and K.E after reading this blog.I also know more about how G.P.E is converted into K.E.

    ReplyDelete
  13. 7.I learn more about G.P.E and K.E after reading this blog.I also know how G.P.E is converted to K.E in roller coaster.

    ReplyDelete
  14. 16:yea,i understand:)

    ReplyDelete
  15. 27:
    oh yea i get it i get it....
    u take the height from the reference point...
    i always thought it was from the ground...

    ReplyDelete
  16. 14.Harz.. i understand the article..

    ReplyDelete
  17. 12,now i know G.P.E will change according to the reference line(:

    ReplyDelete
  18. 8:
    haha...i always thought physics was boring but i like how the topic is explained using roller coasters and water slides as examples..hahas.

    ReplyDelete
  19. HELLO MR KOH!
    i read your post, & i understand it.
    NUMBER ONE1!

    ReplyDelete
  20. HELLO MR KOH!
    i read your post, & i understand it.
    NUMBER ONE1!
    index no.1

    ReplyDelete
  21. 18: it must have taken a lot effort to come up with theories. It's impressive. (:

    ReplyDelete
  22. 10. I don't really understnad the formula before, but now i understand more about kinetic and potential energy now.

    ReplyDelete
  23. HELLO. HELLO. I didnt know anything at first but know it now. Why, as I'm Smart and you're smart. K.
    Rachel Chua.

    ReplyDelete
  24. 3. I learn more about G.P.E and K.E. I also learn that GPE is height x mass (:

    ReplyDelete